The Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern - A Review
As usual with my reviews I will
not go into detail about what the book is about, go read the description by the
author if you want to know, I will just give my opinions of the book here.
A fantasy novel about a circus is
always going to be of interest to me, as that is exactly the sort of novel I
write. So when I saw the Night Circus I was obviously interested in seeing what
it was like, to go and have a peek at a rival show in town. Novels about
circuses are not thick on the ground so it is exciting to find another one that
is putting on a fine show, but unfortunately the Night Circus is not that type
of novel.
When you watch a magician perform
their tricks you should be taken away from reality, into a world where you
don’t question where they are getting those doves from, or how are they able to
cut a woman in half without killing her. The minute that you start to wonder
how the magic is performed is the minute you are taken out of the world. The
writing of a novel is the same trick, and the author must use words to take you
away from reality. The Night Circus is an illusion that will try to tantalise
your mind with its vivid descriptions of the circus, and make you not consider
what is below, but it lost this magic on me half way through the show.
At one point I just stopped and
started to wonder what was beneath all the description of the tents and quickly
realised that the novel was a shallow illusion. The characters are no more than
simple faces and names, which you are given hardly any distinctive
characteristics for, with little sense of what emotions or thoughts are going
through their minds. Development of the cast and plot are swept aside to make
room for more description of the circus, and so the novel relies on keeping
your attention on the vivid descriptions within, but as I said before this is
an illusion that if it doesn’t work will quickly leave you with a hollow
feeling about the tale.
The plot is simple and
predictable, with a similar depth as the cast. From the very start it is
obvious what is going to happen to the two main characters, and when it does
happen there is little reason behind it. The ending is given away early by
probably one of the only times a character has a deep thought in the novel, and
the period setting of the tale could be any as the story unfolds as it really
doesn’t matter. So this predictability with no surprises doesn’t help the
illusion that is being performed. The whole show makes it obvious what is going
to come and when the illusion is broken we only have the hope of being proven
wrong, with what we expect to come, to keep us going. The main plot that
brought us to the show is almost discarded before the end is reached, with
little regard to its importance, so if it was so little to the writer then why
bother hanging a story upon it to start with. No grand plans are unfolding
here, and the soul of the tale quickly fades.
This to me was a wasted
opportunity to explore the world of the circus and theatre, a shallow show
empty of emotion. And a can a circus without clowns even be called a circus? To
fully enjoy the performance that is the Night Circus you have accept the magic
that is before your eyes, to not question where the rabbit is being pulled
from. The descriptions are vivid and imaginative, but if you stop for a second
to question the show, to take a peek behind the curtain, it will probably lose
you from its spell.
And so I leave the rival show disappointed
about what it could have been, but remain hopeful that other, grander shows may
come along one day to keep us company with their magic words.
Three Clowns
Three Clowns
No comments:
Post a Comment